Drawing for AG

USPTO serial 85038122

AG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3969166Status 712
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 2011
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc Karish

MARC KARISH KARISH & BJORGUM, PC510 W 6TH ST STE 308LOS ANGELES, CA 90014-1307UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal mesh products, namely, perforated metal sheets, netting, woven wire cloth and metal mesh conveyor belts for handling loadsSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2005
007Metal working machines, namely, machines for producing metal mesh productsSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2016C37.CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL—
May 31, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance