Drawing for THE ULTIMATE IN PROTECTION & PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 85038127

THE ULTIMATE IN PROTECTION & PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE ULTIMATE IN PROTECTION & PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEN A. CARIFFE

KEN A. CARIFFE WORDEN WILLIAMS APC462 STEVENS AVE STE 102SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for enhancing the performance of lubricating oils, greases and internal combustion engine fuels; Chemical additives for use with internal combustion engine fuels; Chemical engine treatments and additives for engine oils, gasoline and diesel fuels, transmission fluids and cooling systemsACTIVEJun 1, 1990
004Hydraulic oils; Industrial and vehicular lubricants; Lubricating oil for motor vehicle engines; Lubricating oils and greases; Lubrication grease for vehicles; Marine lubricants; Non-chemical additives for fuels, lubricants and greases; Non-chemical engine treatments and additives for engine oils, gasoline and diesel fuels, transmission fluids and cooling systemsACTIVEJun 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 11, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 5, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 5, 2011ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Mar 30, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance