Drawing for PLASTIC JUNGLE

USPTO serial 85038269

PLASTIC JUNGLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLASTIC JUNGLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Slafsky

JOHN L. SLAFSKY WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for processing the exchange of gift cards and virtual currencyACTIVE
036providing gift-card-based currency transfer and exchange services; providing electronic funds transfer services via electronic and optical communications networks; providing virtual currency for use via electronic and optical communications networks; providing electronic processing of gift cards as payment which are exchanged with and among consumers and merchants via a global computer networkACTIVE
042software as a service (Saas) services, namely hosting software for the exchange of gift cards and virtual currency, for gift-card-based currency transfer and exchange services, and for electronic funds transfer servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 5, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 31, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 18, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 16, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 25, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 23, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 22, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance