USPTO serial 85039101
X-FLEX BLAST PROTECTION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4064173Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2011
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with X-FLEX BLAST PROTECTION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Berry Plastics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Berry Plastics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Berry Plastics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named X-FLEX BLAST PROTECTION SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |