Drawing for PURE MATTERS

USPTO serial 85039163

PURE MATTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE MATTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shauna M. Wertheim

SHAUNA M. WERTHEIM THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC15th Floor11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVERESTON, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, non-medicated preparations all for care of the skin, hair, and scalp; body and beauty care cosmetics, lotions for face and body care; shampoosACTIVE—
005vitamin-enriched water; vitamin fortified beveragesACTIVE—
029Fruit-based snack food; nut-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; soy-based snack foods; tofu-based snacks; vegetable-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Cereal based snack food; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; multigrain-based snack foods; granola snacksACTIVE—
035Online retail store services in the field of health, beauty and food productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance