USPTO serial 85039289
CONNECTIONS VALLEY VIEW CASINO & HOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4210519Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONNECTIONS VALLEY VIEW CASINO & HOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
Valley Center, CA
Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
Valley Center, CA
Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
Valley Center, CA
Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hillary A. Brooks
HILLARY A BROOKS Brooks Quinn, LLC6513 132nd Ave NE #378Kirkland, WA 98033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing; Cooperative advertising and marketing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by San Pasqual Casino Development Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CONNECTIONS VALLEY VIEW CASINO & HOTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |