USPTO serial 85039955
TRIPOROUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIPOROUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, carbon for industrial use and pharmaceutical use, carbon used in the manufacture of cosmetics, toiletries, soaps, detergents, filtering and purifying media for water and cigarette smoke; carbides; chemical agents for industrial use and pharmaceutical use; chemical agents used in the manufacture of cosmetics, toiletries, soaps, detergents, filtering and purifying media for water and cigarette smoke | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Cosmetics and non-medicated toiletries | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical agents affecting digestive organs, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for the cleansing of one's gastrointestinal tract, the cleansing of one's mouth cavity to remove unwanted bacteria, the prevention of stomach acid, and the regulation of one's intestines; hormones for medical purposes; pharmaceutical agents for epidermis, namely, anti-dermoinfective pharmaceutical preparations, antimicrobial pharmaceutical preparations for dermatologic use, and medicated soaps of Japanese pharmacopoeia; vitamin preparations; nutritional additives for medical purposes for use in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; pharmaceutical agents affecting metabolism, namely, pharmaceutical enzyme preparations for the treatment of excess fat in one's body, and for the treatment of alcohol intoxication; tumor suppressing agents; antibiotic preparations; biological preparations for medical purposes, namely, antitoxins, agents against parasites, namely, pharmaceutical preparations used in treatment of protozoan infection | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; Coffee and Cocoa; Confectionery, namely, almond confectionery, biscuits, candy for food, caramels, chewing gum not for medical purposes, chocolates, crackers, ice cream, pasty, peanut confectionery, sugar confectionery; bread and buns; Seasonings other than spices; Cereal preparations, namely, cereal based snack food, cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement, processed cereals, corn flakes, maize flakes, oat flakes; Chinese stuffed dumplings; Sandwiches; Chinese steamed dumplings; Sushi; Takoyaki, namely; fried balls of mix with small piece of octopus; Steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; Hamburger sandwiches; Pizzas; Hot dogs sandwiches; Meat pies; Ravioli | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer; Carbonated soft drinks; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Whey beverages; Vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TRIPOROUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |