Drawing for PREGO WORKOUTS

USPTO serial 85040686

PREGO WORKOUTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREGO WORKOUTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Behles

JOHN M. BEHLES Behles Van Staden, PLC115 West 3rd Street, Suite 401JENKS, OK 74103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing instruction in the field of physical exercise for pregnant womenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 24, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 23, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 31, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 31, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance