Drawing for AQUAFRIENDS

USPTO serial 85040844

AQUAFRIENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUAFRIENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina

KIT M. STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys and playthings, namely, plush toys, dolls, and action figuresACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 17, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 17, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
May 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance