USPTO serial 85040919
MUZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Hankin
MARC E. HANKIN HANKIN PATENT LAW, APC11414 THURSTON CIRLOS ANGELES, CA 90049-2435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath beads; Bath foam; Bath oils; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Blush; Body cream; Body emulsions; Body masks; Body oils; Body powder; Body scrub; Body sprays; Body wash; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in the form of milks, lotions and emulsions; Cuticle conditioners; Cuticle cream; Cuticle removing preparations; Decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; Eau de toilette and eau de cologne; Emery boards; Exfoliants for HAIR AND FACE; Eye cream; Eye gels; Eye liner; Eye make-up; Eye pencils; Eye shadows; Eyebrow colors; Eyebrow pencils; Face and body beauty creams; Face milk and lotions; Face powder; Facial concealer; Facial emulsions; Facial make-up; Facial masks; Facial scrubs; Facial washes; False eyelashes; False nails; Fingernail sculpturing overlays; Foundation make-up; Gel eye masks; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, FIXERS, GELS, LACQUERS, SERUMS, CREAMS, MOUSSES, NOURISHERS, OILS, EMOLLIENTS, POMADES, RELAXERS, RELAXING PREPARATIONS, RINSES, SPRAYS, STRAIGHTENING PREPARATIONS, STYLING PREPARATIONS, TONICS, WAVING PREPARATIONS, COLOR, COLOR REMOVERS, LIGHTENERS, BALMS, MILKS AND MASKS; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair colouring and dyes; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair lotions; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Henna for cosmetic purposes; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Lotions for strengthening the nails; Make-up; Make-up remover; Mascara; Mousse for BATH; Nail care preparations; Nail enamel; Nail enamel removers; Nail glitter; Nail hardeners; Nail polish; Nail polish remover; Nail stencils; Nail tips; Non-medicated bath preparations; Non-medicated body soaks; Non-medicated bubble bath preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; Pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; Sachets; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Shaving balm; Shaving creams; Shaving foam; Shaving lotions; Shaving mousse; Shaving preparations; Shaving soap; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Soaps for body care | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |