USPTO serial 85041421
THE FUTURE OF HELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FUTURE OF HELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A WIDE AREA NETWORK AS PART OF THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF A VARIETY OF INFORMATION AND DATA IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, namely, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK-TO-NETWORK PEERING SERVICES FOR VOICE, VIDEO AND CONTENT, ENABLING NETWORK OPERATORS TO EXCHANGE VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOLS, INSTANT MESSAGING, MULTIMEDIA INSTANT MESSAGING, VIDEO SESSIONS, CALLS AND CONTENT, AND PUSH-TO-TALK OVER CELLULAR SERVICES WHICH ORIGINATE, TERMINATE AND SHARE CALLS OR SESSIONS FOR MOBILE, FIXED AND BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS; ELECTRONIC DATA AND SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SERVICES; MOBILE TELEPHONE SERVICES, namely, DIGITAL TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES, AND PROVIDING REMOTE ACCESS TO ONLINE DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO, AUDIO, DIGITAL SIGNALS, GAMES, BELL TONES, FILES, PROGRAMS, LOGOS, DATA, VOICES, SCREENSAVERS, AND MUSIC; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, IMAGES, TEXT, VIDEO, GRAPHICS, DIGITAL SIGNALS, AND AUDIO CONTENT; COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF TEXT, CONTENT, AUDIO, VIDEO, IMAGES, GRAPHICS, DIGITAL SIGNALS, NOTIFICATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS, NEWS, DATA, FILES, SOUNDS, GAMES, RING TONES, WALLPAPER, ELECTRONIC SHORT MESSAGING SERVICES (SMS), SMS ALERTS, WIRELESS APPLICATION PROTOCOL (WAP) PUSH ALERTS, MULTIMEDIA MESSAGING SERVICES (MMS) AND INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL SIGNALS AND INTERACTIVE INFORMATION VIA GLOBAL LAND AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CABLE NETWORKS, RADIO FREQUENCIES, AND SATELLITE NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS APPLICATION PROTOCOL MESSAGES; PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS AND ACCESS TO GLOBAL LAND AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, RADIO FREQUENCIES, SATELLITE NETWORKS, CABLE NETWORKS, MOBILE IP AND ON-LINE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |