USPTO serial 85041968
EAGLE MARINE SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAGLE MARINE SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Malutta
ANTHONY J MALUTTA KILPATRICK TOWNSEND AND STOCKTON LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTRFL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |