USPTO serial 85042926
STELAIRÉ BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STELAIRÉ BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Morton Grove, IL
Morton Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen T. Scherrer
STEPHEN T. SCHERRER SCHERRER PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW, P.C.17 E CRYSTAL LAKE AVECRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60014-6101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic brushes; air brush machines; and cosmetics, namely, eye brow powder, eye brow pencil, eye shadow, eye shadow base, eye liner, mascara, concealer, foundation, powder, bronzing powder, blush, lipstick, lip liner, and lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |