Drawing for RIPTIDE

USPTO serial 85043705

RIPTIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIPTIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; vitamin supplements; mineral supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements; meal replacement bars and powders; nutritional food bars for use as a meal replacement; herbal supplements; food supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 13, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2013IULNITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Nov 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 25, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 20, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 26, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance