USPTO serial 85044196
THE ICING ON THE CAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ICING ON THE CAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daryl W Schnurr
DARYL W SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVD.SUITE 300, ACCELERATOR BUILDINGWATERLOO, ON, N2L6R5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Cosmetics and body care products, namely, moisturizing creams, moisturizing lotions, body mousse, body glazes, lip balms, lip glosses, hand creams, foot creams, bath and shower products, namely, skin care froths and creams; (Based on Intent to Use) Cosmetics and body care products, namely, body scrubs, skin balms, bath and shower products, namely, lotions, shower gels, shower body polish, bubble bath, body sprays, shampoos, hair conditioners, powders, oils and skin moisturizers, and make-up | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |