USPTO serial 85044494
I AM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I AM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq.
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6055Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; artificial eyelashes; body powder; incense; non-medicated lip balm; non-medicated hair care preparations; non-medicated nail care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations; makeup remover; massage oils; essential oils for personal use; shaving creams and gels and depilatory creams and gels; shower and bath gels, bath crystals, milks, oils, bubble bath, powders and salts; soaps and detergents; sun screen and sun tanning preparations; toothpaste and mouthwash, all associated with William Adams, professionally known as will.i.am | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |