Drawing for I AM

USPTO serial 85044495

I AM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I AM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini,

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HARMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cameras; cell phones and accessories therefor, namely, decorative charms, hands-free headsets, batteries and chargers, power adapters, face plates, belt clips and holsters, and mounting devices; cases or fitted plastic skins for scratch protection for cameras, cell phones, laptop computers, PDAs, portable music players, handheld gaming devices, and handheld global positioning devices; PDAs; portable global positioning devices; portable music players; mobile radios; computer and video games, namely, cartridges, discs, software, controllers, and consoles for use, with an external display screen or monitor; backpacks adapted for holding laptop computers; computer storage devices, namely, flash drives; computer hardware and computer peripherals; computer storage devices, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; downloadable electronic, digital or computer games, graphics, ring tones and multi-media files; downloadable audio and video files featuring music, dramatic and comedic performances; digital trading cards in the nature of multimedia software recorded on magnetic media featuring musical, dramatic and comedic content; answering machines; baby monitors; decorative magnets; electric door bells; electric hair dryers, irons and curlers; electronic diaries; eyeglasses and eyeglass cases; headphones and earphones; juke boxes; lighted displays for outdoor use in the nature of LED displays; mousepads; neon signs; safety eyewear; slot machines; sporting helmets; sunglasses and sunglass cases associated with William Adams, professionally known as will.i.am; switch plate covers; educational software featuring instruction in health and well being; motion picture films, television programs, and documentaries featuring dramatic, comedic and musical performances; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; and pre-recorded DYDs, videotapes, and other audiovisual recordings featuring musical, dramatic and comedic performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 3, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 20, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 7, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 7, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2013CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 31, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 9, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2011MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
May 18, 2011RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2011ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Apr 18, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance