USPTO serial 85044743
STOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billie Jean Smith
Billie Jean Smith MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Grilling accessories, namely, wood chips, lighter fluid and charcoal for grilling | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Grilling accessories, namely, propane generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Grilling accessories, namely, batteries and battery chargers for use in barbecue grilling, thermometers and temperature probes used for grilling meat, and timers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | grilling accessories, namely, rotisseries, grill fans, lighters for use with grilling, and non-electric woks; outdoor fireplaces and portable outdoor fireplaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Grilling accessories, namely, rubber hoses for connecting a propane generator to a grill | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Grilling accessories, namely, grilling forks, spatulas, grilling tongs, sauce brushes, grill cleaning brushes, grilling mats, grilling tool holders in the nature of household containers for holding grilling forks, spatulas and tongs | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Grilling accessories, namely, matches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named STOK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |