Drawing for MEDTRAK

USPTO serial 85044817

MEDTRAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDTRAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam K. Sacharoff

ADAM K. SACHAROFF MUCH SHELIST DENENBERG AMENT & RUBENSTEIN, PC191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer interconnectable hand held electronic medication dispenser which stores information and downloads the same which is related to medication compliance management, said dispenser not for providing operational efficiencies for the monitoring of patient placement, transport, procedure status, and management of healthcare professionals and staff in the healthcare industry; said dispenser not for use with real time location systems related to patient placement, transport, procedure status, and management of healthcare professionals, staff, equipment and non-medication supplies in the healthcare industry, but said dispenser will provide for the monitoring of patient adherence and medication administration activities in the healthcare industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 21, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 4, 2011CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 27, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance