USPTO serial 85045215
ENTERPRISE DATABASE CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERPRISE DATABASE CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
KEVIN T. OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services; business consulting services; compilation of information; research and analysis of information from computer databases and the internet; collection and systematization of information into computer databases; compilation and systematization of information into computer databases; providing an on-line searchable database featuring business information; providing business information, namely, commercial, corporate and statistical information provided on-line from a computer database or the Internet; providing business information over global, local and internal computer networks on the subjects of business planning, business reengineering, on-line commerce and e-commerce; providing business information via the internet on the subjects of business planning, business reengineering, on-line commerce and e-commerce; business consultancy services in the field of business planning, business administration, product development, public relations and business development; business planning services; business administration and management services; public relations services; providing database services featuring business, commercial, enterprise and government contact information; business consultation services and consulting services in design and development, integration and interfacing of computer systems and networks and computer network architectures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | RRGD | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT DENIED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |