USPTO serial 85045231
EDC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC9302 LEE HIGHWAYSUITE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031-1215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of systems of computer hardware and networking equipment and combinations of computer hardware and networking equipment and software, software systems and software solutions for others, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; consulting services relating to planning, design and analysis of computer hardware and networking equipment, systems of computer hardware and networking equipment and combinations of computer hardware and networking equipment and software, software systems and software solutions for information processes, systems and business reengineering; computer consulting services, namely, computer systems analysis and design of computer systems and information technology systems for others, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; providing consulting services in design and development, integration and interfacing of computer hardware and software systems and networks and computer network architectures; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of software and software systems for others; consulting services relating to planning, design and analysis of software solutions for information processes, systems and business reengineering; computer consulting services, namely, computer systems analysis and design of computer systems and information technology systems for others, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; design for others of software applications, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; providing software systems design and development for others, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; information technology consultation services, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design; computer consulting services, namely, consultation on information technology, excluding as such are related to the fields of collision analysis, vehicle safety research and vehicle design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |