Drawing for VIKING BRIGADE

USPTO serial 85045254

VIKING BRIGADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIKING BRIGADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah Anne Keefe

SARAH ANNE KEEFE WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 7037ATLANTA, GA 30357-0037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007DishwashersACTIVE—
011Apparatus for cooking, namely, cooktops; cooking ovens; freezers; refrigeratorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 31, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 31, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance