Drawing for ZZIMA

USPTO serial 85045506

ZZIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZZIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meredith Lobel-Angel

MEREDITH LOBEL-ANGEL ANGEL LAW2601 OCEAN PARK BLVD STE 205SANTA MONICA, CA 90405-5269UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed materials, namely, printed calendars, printed forms, printed game instruction manuals, printed game books featuring game tips and techniques, printed game albums, printed booklets featuring scenes and characters based on video games; stationery, postcards, informational sheets about computer games, social networking, game communities; posters, and brochures about game monetization, computer games, social networking and game communitiesACTIVE—
028Portable electronic games and handheld units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers onlyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 7, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 22, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance