USPTO serial 85046108
IN THE PURSUIT OF HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN THE PURSUIT OF HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katharine F. Rowe
KATHARINE F. ROWE SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP50 N LAURA ST STE 2600JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-3629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | philanthropic services, namely, providing grants to local and community-based organizations and groups to combat the root causes of obesity; providing educational scholarships | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named IN THE PURSUIT OF HEALTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |