Drawing for EVE L.

USPTO serial 85046395

EVE L.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EVE L.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric H. Melzer

ERIC H. MELZER GREENBAUM, ROWE, SMITH & DAVIS LLP99 WOOD AVE S FL 4ISELIN, NJ 08830-2734UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, a glow in the dark miniature golf course, video game arcade, redemption game arcade, namely, an amusement arcade featuring games that dispense tickets which may be redeemed for prizes and conducting birthday partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 23, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 14, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance