Drawing for L'OREAL PROFESSIONNEL SERIE NATURE AQUA RESPECT

USPTO serial 85046581

L'OREAL PROFESSIONNEL SERIE NATURE AQUA RESPECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L'OREAL PROFESSIONNEL SERIE NATURE AQUA RESPECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Sherman

ROBERT L. SHERMAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shampoos; products for hair styling and hair care, namely, gels, mousses, balms, cream, wax, serums, lotions and masks; hair lacquers; hair colouring and hair decolorant preparations; protective coloring preparations for treated hair; permanent waving and curling preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 17, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 17, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance