Drawing for MAGICMIX

USPTO serial 85046945

MAGICMIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGICMIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Small electric kitchen appliances, namely, electric food blenders, electric hand mixers, electric stand mixers and electric food processorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 23, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 23, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2011OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance