USPTO serial 85046949
FRESCO GICLEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESCO GICLEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printing substrate in the nature of lime plaster sheet on which art, posters and photographs can be printed | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Sheets of lime plaster for covering walls; sheets of lime plaster for covering ceilings; building materials, namely, lime plaster sheet for use on interior walls and lime plaster sheet for use on interior ceilings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |