Drawing for GOT STRAPS

USPTO serial 85047191

GOT STRAPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOT STRAPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabrina C. Stavish

SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAYSUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Bumper stickersACTIVEApr 23, 2010
035Online retail store services featuring straps for musical instruments and accessories for musical instrumentsACTIVEApr 23, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 21, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2011CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 5, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 2, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance