USPTO serial 85048303
CANADA'S OWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4797511Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2015
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANADA'S OWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, CA
The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Paik
Susan Paik TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO, P.C.425 BROADHOLLOW ROAD, SUITE 302MELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANADA'S OWN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Ontario Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CANADA'S OWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |