Drawing for IN2

USPTO serial 85048617

IN2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IN2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doug Colton

DOUG COLTON FRIED GREEN APPS, INC655 ENGINEERING DR STE 150NORCROSS, GA 30092-2894UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive game software, computer game software, electronic game programs, downloadable interactive, computer, video and electronic game programs; mobile phone computer interactive applications for: providing entertainment information and engagements; playing, creating, editing and managing music; and playing gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 8, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance