Drawing for MYCAREADVOCATES

USPTO serial 85049521

MYCAREADVOCATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYCAREADVOCATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. Frijouf

Daniel R. Frijouf Frijouf, Rust & Pyle, P.A.201 East Davis BlvdTampa, FL 33606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Consulting services in the field of medical care; Providing consumers, employers and partners with diagnosis research, case management, nursing home research, audit and review of billing and insurance denials, provider referrals, assisted living coordination, RX pricing/comparison and provider fee negotiationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 9, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 23, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 13, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 25, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance