Drawing for NORSEMEN

USPTO serial 85049681

NORSEMEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORSEMEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Humphrey

J. Scott Humphrey HUMPHREY + LAW1158 26th Street PMB 560Santa Monica, CA 90403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Film, Television, Music and new media entertainment production servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 22, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 13, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 13, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 13, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 26, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 24, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 22, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 22, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance