CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KNIGHT LIGHTS

USPTO serial 85049717

KNIGHT LIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNIGHT LIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Humphrey

J. Scott Humphrey HUMPHREY + LAW1158 26th Street PMB 560Santa Monica, CA 90403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electrical lamps that plug directly into wall socketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 5, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 5, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 19, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 22, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 22, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance