USPTO serial 85049994
SUPREME COURT INSIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPREME COURT INSIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BOULEVARD, 2ND FLOOR4 PENN CENTERPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing newsletters in the field of law via e-mail; Providing on-line publications in the nature of magazines and newsletters in the field of law | ABANDONED | Jun 2, 2010 |
| 045 | providing news, information and commentary in the field of law through an Internet website | ABANDONED | Jun 2, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |