USPTO serial 85050451
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Wilson
JEFFREY L WILSON JENKINS WILSON TAYLOR & HUNT PAUNIVERSITY TOWERSUITE 1200 3100 TOWER BOULEVARDDURHAM, NC 27707-2563| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of building insulation in commercial and residential buildings; weatherization services, namely, installation of building insulation; sealing of crawl spaces in buildings; building remodeling for energy efficiency; basement waterproofing services; installation and maintenance of solar thermal and solar photovoltaic (PV) installations; construction consultation relating to renewable energy systems; installation of replacement windows and doors; and energy consulting services, namely, home energy assessment and building inspection services for the purpose of determining home improvements needed to improve energy use and efficiency based on home energy rating and energy modeling systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |