Drawing for AURA

USPTO serial 85050679

AURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Dingman

Brian M. Dingman Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP1800 West Park Drive, Suite 400Westborough, MA 01581-3926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for managing data center equipmentACTIVEMay 18, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 15, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 5, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 4, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 25, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 18, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 12, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 22, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 14, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance