Drawing for BEE KIND! BEE POLITE!

USPTO serial 85051894

BEE KIND! BEE POLITE!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEE KIND! BEE POLITE!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy B. Krieger

STACY B. KRIEGER BECKER MEISEL LLC354 EISENHOWER PKWY STE 1500LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039-1023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, dresses, skirts, jackets, sweaters, mittens, hats with visor, knitted and crocheted hats, bucket hats, socks, swimsuits; infant cloth and plastic bibs; ear flaps in the nature of a hat; one-piece infant clothingACTIVE—
041Entertainment and educational services in the nature of a television series featuring animation and live action directed to children, parents and educators; entertainment and educational services, namely, providing seminars, lectures and puppet shows in the field of good manners and proper behavior directed to children, parents and educators; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going webisodes featuring programs in the field of good manners and proper behavior utilizing learning exercises, games and animation directed to children, parents and educators via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 21, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance