Drawing for VOOM

USPTO serial 85052512

VOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric B. Meyertons

ERIC B. MEYERTONS MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEL, P.C.PO BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer search engine software used for marketing research; electronic marketing tools, namely, computer software for measuring, analyzing, and evaluating consumer responses for marketing purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 28, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 20, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance