Drawing for PERFECT POOL 3" TABLETS

USPTO serial 85052661

PERFECT POOL 3" TABLETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4268645Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2013
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT POOL 3" TABLETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Digirolamo

MICHAEL R ANNIS HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP190 CARONDELET PLAZASUITE 600ST LOUIS, MO 63108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Water treatment chemicals for use in swimming pools and spasSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 11, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 15, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 8, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 3, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 1, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 15, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 12, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 15, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 4, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance