CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PURE GREEN BY PATIO ARMOR

USPTO serial 85052930

PURE GREEN BY PATIO ARMOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE GREEN BY PATIO ARMOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Weisbein

Robert S. Weisbein Foley & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Protective covers specifically designed for patio umbrellas, all of the foregoing goods made in whole or part of eco-friendly goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2012INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 1, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance