Drawing for GREAT ATLANTIC CRAB COMPANY

USPTO serial 85053623

GREAT ATLANTIC CRAB COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3960090Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 10, 2011
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT ATLANTIC CRAB COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Holt

KATHERINE M SCHOLZ KELLY HOLT & CHRISTENSON PLLC113 WEST MAIN STREETWACONIA, MN 55387UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Seafood, namely, crabSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 30, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2015C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 27, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2015CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Apr 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2011CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 24, 2011PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Mar 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 22, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance