Drawing for PURECARE ANTIBACTERIAL SILVER

USPTO serial 85054923

PURECARE ANTIBACTERIAL SILVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURECARE ANTIBACTERIAL SILVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Nussbaum

PETER NUSSBAUM WOLFF & SAMSON PC1 BOLAND DRWEST ORANGE, NJ 07052UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bed sheets containing silver nanoparticlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 18, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance