Drawing for SIERRA WOMEN'S CLASSICS

USPTO serial 85054990

SIERRA WOMEN'S CLASSICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRA WOMEN'S CLASSICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David O. Johanson

DAVID O. JOHANSON BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP1 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110-1726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Catalog mail order, telephone order and fax order services, and computerized on-line shopping and ordering services, all featuring women's clothing, outerwear, footwear, underwear, headwear, gloves, belts, sunglasses, travel gear, luggage, bags, watches, general consumer home goods, outdoor and sport gear and equipment, purses, handbags, jewelry, and accessories for the foregoing goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 8, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance