USPTO serial 85055706
CURIOTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CURIOTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable films and television programs featuringCURIOTICA provided via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Cable television programming; Direction of making radio or television programs; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for others; Education and entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of ongoing television programs in the field of family management and relationships; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of CURIOTICA; Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going reality based television program; Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing IPTV (Internet Protocol Television), television programming segments in the field of positive psychology, personal relationships, the art and science of happiness; Entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programming; Entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of children's entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going television programs in the field of CURIOTICA via a global computer network; Operation of robotic cameras, video equipment and/or audio equipment for production of internet teleconferencing, teleconferencing or television programs; Operation of video equipment or audio equipment etc. for production of radio or television programs; Producing ongoing television programs on blackjack card tournaments; Production of cable television programs; Production of closed caption television programs; Production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring CURIOTICA; Production of radio and television programs; Production of radio or television programs; Production of television programs; Production of video and creation of visual effects for others for use in DVDs, television programs and on web sites; Providing on-line entertainment information, namely, information about television programming; Television program syndication; Television programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Treiber, Eric
- Other trademarks owned by Vernon, Betony
- Other trademarks owned by Mullins, Aimee
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CURIOTICA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |