Drawing for MYHEALTHCHECK BY LIFE TIME FITNESS

USPTO serial 85055986

MYHEALTHCHECK BY LIFE TIME FITNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYHEALTHCHECK BY LIFE TIME FITNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Steffen

JAMES R. STEFFEN Faegre Baker Daniels LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic newsletters in the fields of health, fitness and wellnessACTIVE—
016Newsletters in the field of health, fitness and wellnessACTIVE—
035Providing assistance, fitness evaluation and consultation to corporate clients to help their employees make health, wellness and nutritional changes in their daily living to increase productivity, lower health care costs and achieve overall wellnessACTIVE—
041On-line electronic newsletters delivered by email in the fields of health, fitness and wellness; physical fitness instruction and health club services, namely, providing instruction and access to equipment in the field of physical exercise; providing health and wellness seminarsACTIVE—
044Medical diagnostic testing, monitoring and reporting services; health risk assessment and screening services, namely, medical screening; wellness coaching, namely, wellness consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance