Drawing for RATHER SOUTHERN, SLIGHTLY SOPHISTICATED

USPTO serial 85056245

RATHER SOUTHERN, SLIGHTLY SOPHISTICATED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RATHER SOUTHERN, SLIGHTLY SOPHISTICATED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Patrick McCraney

R. PATRICK MCCRANEY WILLOUGHBY LAW GROUP, PLLCSUITE 107800 Woodlands ParkwayRIDGELAND, MS 39157

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Promotional Products, namely, mugs, tumblers and coastersACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, Hooded Sweat Shirts, Dress Shirts, JacketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 1, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 5, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance