Drawing for RUGGED RACE PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 85056333

RUGGED RACE PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUGGED RACE PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas F. Lebens

Thomas F. Lebens Sinsheimer Juhnke Lebens & McIvor, LLP1010 Peach StreetSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications headsets for use with communication radios, intercom systems, or other communications network transceivers; Mobile radios; Portable radiosACTIVEOct 22, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2012PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 30, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 16, 2012PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 10, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance