USPTO serial 85056581
SUPERIOR ENERGY PERFORMANCE (SEP)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERIOR ENERGY PERFORMANCE (SEP)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Business auditing; Business consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency; Business consulting services relating to the integration of the areas of business process technology, organizational learning, change management, and operational sustainability; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business data analysis; Business efficiency advice; Business efficiency expert services; Business organization and operation consultancy; Conducting energy audits of commercial and institutional facilities for the purpose of improving energy efficiency; Consultation in the field of energy efficiency; Consulting services in the field of energy usage management and energy efficiency; Consulting services in the fields of energy consumption and usage conservation to improve energy efficiency; Energy auditing; Energy usage management; Management and business consulting services in the field of operations efficiency; Operational business assistance to enterprises(Based on Intent to Use) Business auditing; Business consulting and advisory services in the field of energy efficiency; Business consulting services relating to the integration of the areas of business process technology, organizational learning, change management, and operational sustainability; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business data analysis; Business efficiency advice; Business efficiency expert services; Business organization and operation consultancy; Conducting energy audits of commercial and institutional facilities for the purpose of improving energy efficiency; Consultation in the field of energy efficiency; Consulting services in the field of energy usage management and energy efficiency; Consulting services in the fields of energy consumption and usage conservation to improve energy efficiency; Energy auditing; Energy usage management; Management and business consulting services in the field of operations efficiency; Operational business assistance to enterprises | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |