USPTO serial 85056765
ONE BIG TEAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE BIG TEAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Silver, NJ
Little Silver, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas Ryder
Douglas Ryder Douglas Ryder87 n. Sunnycrest DriveLITTLE SILVER, NJ 07739-1126Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing websites featuring online marketing tools, such as recorded presentations and recorded interviews to aid in the training and success of network marketers | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |